Close search
 
Home | News | Reporting to multiple identities: an update from our consultation

Reporting to multiple identities: an update from our consultation

13 March 2026

Our consultation on reporting usage for users with multiple institutional identities has wrapped up. There was a clear direction of travel in the responses that we received, but not unanimous agreement.

Based on the overall feedback, we’re looking at creating a best practice guide in which we offer a recommendation plus a fallback postion.

  • Publishers should report usage by a user with multiple institutional identities to all of the institutions, even if one or more doesn’t hold a license for the content. This is in line with option one from our consultation.
  • The fallback position will be for platforms to restrict users to a single institutional identity during a session. That means usage will only ever be reported for one institution at a time. As a side effect, the fallback might mean users being denied access to content they’re entitled to see.

This reflects current practices in place across our publisher and technology provider respondents, as well as most – though not all – library respondent preferences. We know some libraries would prefer for usage to only be reported to licensed institutions. Unfortunately that creates a lot of technical complexity. Our recommendation therefore primarily came down to technical simplicity and reporting clarity.

Next steps

Tasha is going to work up a best practice guide for the Executive Committee to review in their April meeting. Once Exec signs off the guide, it’ll appear on the Best Practice page.

This website uses cookies
This site uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. We use necessary cookies to make sure that our website works. We’d also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. By clicking “Allow All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
These cookies are required for basic functionalities such as accessing secure areas of the website, remembering previous actions and facilitating the proper display of the website. Necessary cookies are often exempt from requiring user consent as they do not collect personal data and are crucial for the website to perform its core functions.
A “preferences” cookie is used to remember user preferences and settings on a website. These cookies enhance the user experience by allowing the website to remember choices such as language preferences, font size, layout customization, and other similar settings. Preference cookies are not strictly necessary for the basic functioning of the website but contribute to a more personalised and convenient browsing experience for users.
A “statistics” cookie typically refers to cookies that are used to collect anonymous data about how visitors interact with a website. These cookies help website owners understand how users navigate their site, which pages are most frequently visited, how long users spend on each page, and similar metrics. The data collected by statistics cookies is aggregated and anonymized, meaning it does not contain personally identifiable information (PII).
Marketing cookies are used to track user behaviour across websites, allowing advertisers to deliver targeted advertisements based on the user’s interests and preferences. These cookies collect data such as browsing history and interactions with ads to create user profiles. While essential for effective online advertising, obtaining user consent is crucial to comply with privacy regulations.